We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!


media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us


Close [x]

Blog + Articles


  • Industry Articles (10,766)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Negative Media (121)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (416)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (138)
  • Wink's Articles (159)
  • Wink's Blogs (122)
  • Wink's Press Releases (63)
  • Blog Archives

  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • DOL Fiduciary Rule Hurts Now, Annuity Community Says

    April 25, 2017 by Allison Bell

    Click HERE to view the original article via ThinkAdvisor

    The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors told the U.S. Department of Labor earlier this week that the DOL fiduciary rule is already hurting NAIFA members, and the NAIFA members’ clients.

    NAIFA gathered information for a new comment letter by conducting a member survey. The group received 1,093 responses.

    • 46% of the participants said the number of products they can offer clients has dropped.
    • 20% said they have seen minimum account sizes rise.
    • 43% said their commission compensation arrangements have gotten worse. 

    NAIFA President Paul Dougherty wrote in the comment letter summarizing the survey results that DOL should recognize that industry professionals may disagree about what products to offer clients.

    “Avoid the de facto elimination of entire classes of products from the marketplace,” Dougherty wrote.

    The annuity distributor has set up an RIA, and it has also applied for financial institution status.

    Dougherty’s letter is part of the latest wave of comments on the fiduciary rule and a related proposal, the Best Interest Contract Exemption for Insurance Intermediaries draft.

    President Donald Trump brought on the latest wave Feb. 3, when he sent the DOL a letter asking officials to get more information about the possibility that the fiduciary rule and related regulations could cause problems for retirement savers. The DOL then began the process of postponing implementation of the rule, to get more time to study the effects of the rule. The DOL also put out a request for comments about the actual and possible effects of the rule. Submissions for that round of comments were due Monday.

    The American Council of Life Insurers, the National Association for Fixed Annuities, the Insured Retirement Institute, and the Indexed Annuity Leadership Council were some of the many insurance and annuity organizations that wrote to say the rule and the intermediaries draft are already hurting the annuity industry.

    Here’s a look at what was in some of the annuity-related comments.

    1. Annuity industry participants dislike outsiders’ critiques of the annuity market.

    Many commenters blasted the math and data choices behind an annuity sales incentives white paper Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., recently released.

    David Stertzer, chief executive officer of the Association for Advanced Life Underwriting, said attacks on annuity sellers and advisors have excluded important benefits, such as the effects that a good advisor can have on a client’s saving and investment behavior.

    Blake Woodard, a life insurance agent in Fort Worth, Texas, said he believes annuity market analysts have erred by assuming that all recipients of conflicted advice came to bad ends.

    “Some annuity purchases may turn out well for investors, even if the salesperson’s advice was biased or malicious,” Woodard wrote.

    Even if conflicted advice causes some problems for retirement investors, “there are far larger and more insidious conflicts of interest threatening investors than an insurance company convention in Maui,” Woodard wrote. “But such conflicts do not a colorful white paper make.”

    2. Uncertainty about the DOL fiduciary rule, and efforts to realign product offerings to comply with the rule, have pounded annuity sales.

    Joseph McKeever III and Michael Hadley, lawyers for an industry group, the Committee of Annuity Insurers, said only unthinking supporters of the fiduciary rule can see the drop in annuity sales as good news.

    “Anyone who actually helps Americans secure guaranteed income in retirement, or supports access to lifetime income, must conclude that these developments exactly the adverse effects contemplated by the president’s memorandum,” McKeever and Hadley said.

    3. A class-action lawsuit provision in the insurance intermediaries draft is unwelcome.

    Representatives for John Hancock, Transamerica, MassMutual and other insurers said they believe the drafters of the intermediaries proposal wrote it in such a way that lawsuits would be the primary enforcement mechanism.

    John Deitelbaum and Kevin Finnegan, two senior vice presidents at MassMutual, wrote that encouraging class-action lawsuits is a bad enforcement mechanism.

    “The exorbitant expenses associated with defending class actions and the resulting settlements, which disproportionately benefit the lawyers involved, will inevitably be borne by those the fiduciary rule is designed to protect,” the MassMutual lawyers wrote.

    4. Consumer groups strongly support the goals of the DOL fiduciary rule.

    Industry groups say complying with the fiduciary rule would be too expensive for small accounts to support that expense.

    Consumer said requiring retirement advisors to put clients’ interests first is especially important for clients with small account balances.

    David Certner, legislative counsel at AARP, wrote that lower- and middle-income retirement investors need every penny of their retirement savings. Without the DOL fiduciary rule, retirement investors are at risk of a 1% drop in annual returns on retirement savings, Certner said.

    5. Many advisors believe the DOL fiduciary rule and insurance intermediaries draft are unrealistic.

    Deborah Castiglioni, the owner of a registered investment adviser firm in Missouri, said her firm already gets 60% of its revenue from clients who pay service fees.

    She said, however, that the DOL rule provisions aimed at clients who still want commission-based products are unworkable.

    Simply getting all of the new contracts DOL wants agents and advisor to use in place would be nearly impossible, and a fiduciary standard shift could lead to complicated questions about how advisors should handle existing, commission-based accounts.

    Even helping an established client add money to an old, commission-based product could lead to a 15% excise tax on the transaction, Castiglioni said.

    Castiglioni said her firm has always made a point of serving smaller clients. “That will not be the case when this rule goes into effect unless substantial changes are made,” she said.

    6. Advisors officially classified as fiduciaries do not necessarily act like fiduciaries.

    Blake Woodard, a life insurance agent in Fort Worth, Texas, told DOL that using a commission-based registered representative gives a consumer three layers of protection: supervision from a broker-dealer; supervision of the broker-dealer by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority; and supervision of FINRA by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

    “By contrast, the RIA world has only one layer of protection,” Woodard said. “The RIA only occasionally is audited by either the SEC or, for smaller RIAs, the RIA’s state securities board…. Bernie Madoff was a fiduciary.”

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on April 20, 2017 by Allison Bell.

    Categories: Industry Articles