We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • An Absent Chairman Is the Least of Anbang’s Problems

    June 14, 2017 by Nisha Gopalan

    (Bloomberg Gadfly) — As a Chinese firm that came from nowhere and transformed into one of the nation’s largest insurers, Anbang Insurance Group Co.’s tumble from grace was perhaps predictable. China Inc.’s history is littered with fallen businessmen, even ones that were politically well connected.

    Caijing Magazine said late Tuesday that Anbang Chairman Wu Xiaohui was taken away by authorities on June 9, citing people it didn’t identify. The news report was later deleted from Caijing’s website and Anbang issued a statement saying Wu is unable to perform his duties for personal reasons.

    It’s a situation that would best be resolved quickly, but probably won’t be.

    A small provincial car insurance company just 12 years ago, Anbang was by last year selling premiums faster than state-owned China Life Insurance Co.

    The bulk of those policies were high-risk, short-term ones masquerading as life insurance products, and they were snapped up by retail investors. Similar to peers including Foresea Life Insurance Co., Anbang was promising returns of at least 6%, well above what could be had from government bonds or bank deposits, according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Steven Lam.

    To meet those sort of yields, Anbang embarked on a global buying spree. Many of its purchases, however, were bricks-and-mortar assets such as hotels that can’t be easily liquidated.

    Wu, whose marriage to the granddaughter of Deng Xiaoping has helped him build contacts, has been almost as adept at forming relationships in the U.S. Anbang, and a company owned by the family of President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, in March ended talks to develop 666 5th Avenue, a Manhattan office tower. Investing in the loss-making property would have won Wu some kudos, both at home and abroad.

    Notwithstanding failed tilts for Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide LLC and Fidelity & Guaranty Life, the assets piled up. Since acquiring New York’s Waldorf Astoria hotel in 2014 for $1.95 billion, Anbang has stretched its tentacles to cover insurers in South Korea and luxury properties across North America.

    The people running those firms would be right to be concerned. Unlike Fosun International Ltd., whose chairman also disappeared for a while to assist authorities in an investigation, regaining the market’s confidence won’t be as straightforward. Guo Guangchang continued participating in major decisions, and Fosun is now back in acquisition mode.

    Crucially, Anbang relied in large part on funding that was ultimately people’s nest eggs. Even many of its overseas purchases that were financed by bank loans used retail investors’ savings as the underlying collateral. It’s the type of behavior Beijing has been seeking to prevent.

    Fosun also made leveraged bets, but sourced its cash from share sales, bonds, local private-equity firms and proceeds from offloading unprofitable assets.

    Outside of messing with people’s money, Anbang was aggressively acquiring shares. As Bloomberg View columnist Christopher Balding noted earlier this week, Anbang’s domestic equity holdings were a staggering 203 billion yuan ($30 billion) at the end of last year, up from 27 billion yuan at the end of 2014.

    Anbang’s life insurance unit was banned in May from applying for new products for three months, after it got a rap over the knuckles for trying to pass off short-term policies as longer-term ones. It’s hard to see how Anbang can keep paying out those promised returns without that income.

    In China, social stability is key. Against that backdrop, Anbang faces an uphill battle, and not only to resolve this latest problem of Wu’s disappearance.

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on June 14, 2017 by Nisha Gopalan.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency