We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Anbang’s Rescue Is China’s Too-Big-to-Fail Moment

    February 27, 2018 by James T. Areddy

    SHANGHAI—A Chinese government takeover of Anbang Insurance Group Co. throws a lifeline to its policyholders—support denied to frustrated clients of some lesser-known financial firms when those companies hit turbulence before ultimately collapsing.

    The China Insurance Regulatory Commission said Friday that a team of financial regulators would manage Anbang for at least a year. It justified the action in the second sentence of a public notice: “to protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and safeguard public interests.”

    Click HERE to view the original article via The Wall Street Journal

    Known abroad for bold acquisitions such as New York City’s Waldorf Astoria Hotel, the unlisted Beijing-based firm owes its war chest to legions of individuals who lent it money when they became policyholders.

    Over the weekend, some of them deluged online forums in China to debate the fallout from government action on themselves, the stock market and the financial industry. If Anbang “went bankrupt and was unable to repay investors, the impact will be significant not only for the moment, but also in the future,” one wrote under a pen name on Baidu Tieba, a popular forum, saying any collapse would spark “chaos.” Others planned to bail on Anbang by redeeming policies early.

    Their tone echoed the online chatter that spilled over into sporadic protests in recent years after the meltdown of smaller financial firms, including credit-guarantee companies and peer-to-peer lenders. Like Anbang, many rode a wave in internet-enabled finance known as fintech to tantalize cash-rich consumers with high-yielding investments that could outperform bank accounts, real estate and the stock market.

    Cash crunches at a string of deposit-taking firms two years ago in Shanghai showed how quickly trouble erupts. At one, a bankruptcy specialist needed protection from a phalanx of police to address angry depositors. Investors in another blocked escalators and sang the national anthem in the fancy mall where it was based. Authorities taped over the logo of a peer-to-peer lender on a touristy street to keep it from attracting protests.

    Anbang is huge, if not regarded by analysts as a systemic risk. Its website claims about $310 billion in assets and counts 35 million customers, including those of affiliate insurers in other parts of Asia and in Europe. Standard & Poor’s ranked Anbang third in size last year among Chinese insurers, with a 9% market share by policies written.

    “I think there are similarities between Anbang’s investors and P2P investors. They are all risk-takers,” says Joe Zhang, an analyst and author of a book on Chinese fintech, “Chasing Subprime Credit.” “However, given Anbang’s size, the regulators may treat the two groups of investors differently.”

    The government takeover appears to minimize the basic risk of a cash squeeze at Anbang if demand for its insurance falls off or it can’t get good deals disposing assets.

    An Anbang spokesman said on Monday that the company fully supports the regulatory takeover and expressed its confidence in the interim management committee overseeing the business. “All the operations and business remain stable,” the spokesman said, adding that Anbang remains “continually committed to the overseas subsidiaries and investments.”

    Originally Posted at The Wall Street Journal on February 26, 2018 by James T. Areddy.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency