We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • While DOL Delays, State Fiduciary Cops Find First Prey

    February 19, 2018 by Scott Martin

    Massachusetts versus Scottrade pushes the long battle over fiduciary duty to the states, where it looks like the regulators have sharpened their teeth. Expect turbulence.

    If your firm invested substantial time and money trying to get ahead of the abortive Labor Department “fiduciary rule,” those resources may not have been completely wasted after all.

    Under Donald Trump, the federal regulators have been supremely indifferent to enforcing the rule, rolling the official start date on some provisions back from last April to June and then to next year.

    But with parts of the rule still on the books, state regulators are charging into the gap. Massachusetts just went up against Scottrade — now a unit of sprawling TD Ameritrade — for failing to respect the “impartial conduct standard” after the June deadline.

    It’s a relatively trivial complaint with deeper implications for the future. Scottrade let a few internal sales contests that applied to client IRAs run past June 9. Because reps were offered prizes to sell into those accounts, the contests ignored client interests.

    We’ll see how the firm treats retirement accounts now that its ownership has changed and the political landscape keeps evolving. 

    For now, if the regulator has its way, the whole affair looks like a simple “fine and forget” lapse. You abstract the retirement accounts from your sales culture. You revert to the rules you were already preparing to follow before the election hit the brakes.

    And if other states pile on, the cumulative fines can get expensive. Scottrade does business nationwide so in theory its activities are vulnerable to scrutiny from 50 different angles at once.

    Massachusetts, home of regulation-friendly Elizabeth Warren, is only the first state to speak up. California could easily step forward next, followed by Washington State, Oregon, Illinois and others. 

    Firms that celebrated when the Trump administration kicked federal enforcement down the road now need to keep an eye on the map. It’s arguably an even bigger regulatory headache than complying with a single federal rule across all offices and all accounts.

    I’ve been saying for years that voluntary compliance is a marketing advantage for firms willing to promote themselves as somehow more client-friendly than competitors who dragged their feet. Perversely, injecting state-by-state uncertainty into the mix opens up a new edge for advisors that only do business in a few “friendly” jurisdictions, while multiplying risk for nationwide networks.

    A generation of advisors grew up in a world where state distinctions receded in the face of more unified federal rules — after all, the bigger you get, the more likely you are to trigger SEC registration minimums, at which point chasing a cross-border clientele starts looking like a more reasonable proposition.

    But if some states enforce big rules that others ignore, it’s not hard to imagine that process reversing. Wealth management could become more localized, more like trust services or insurance. That’s obviously a more fragmented world, creating inefficiencies within the industry as a whole as well as opportunities for niche players to prosper in the gaps.

    Of course, it remains to be seen. Massachusetts, at least, is a notorious old money center with disproportionate AUM at stake. If this is an isolated bit of grandstanding, file it under “fine and forget.”

    Within the state, at least, this isn’t the last word. Local regulators are ready for war. They’re blaming the Labor Department for refusing to follow its own rules and they’re plunging into what they see as a breach.

    Labor can always simply retract the rule for further debate, pulling the rug out from under the states. But as we’ve seen, all it takes is a shift in the political wind to reverse that scenario and raise the fiduciary flag as high as ever.

    And next year the part of the rule advisors really hate — the class action lawsuits — is currently scheduled to take effect. Once again, the clock is ticking. It’s been ticking at various volumes since 2010 at this point. 

    If the regulators and Congress won’t provide permanent clarity, I guess it’s up to the industry to assert leadership and set its own de facto standard. 

    You know your competitive sweet spot. You know what your clients and prospects want and what they don’t care about.

    Give them that. Brag about it. Voluntarily prove that you’re that promise. 

    If the free market is your ultimate regulator, comply with its dictates. Be transparent. Show your work to the people who pay your fees. Build trust.

    It sounds hard. At this point, it’s probably easier than rolling with the waves for another decade.

    Originally Posted at Wealth Advisor on February 19, 2018 by Scott Martin.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency