We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Annuity Sales Inch Closer to a Higher Standard

    August 8, 2018 by Rich Blake

    The National Association of Insurance Commissioner’s (NAIC’s) annuity-rules subcommittee met in Boston on Saturday, August 4, with a goal of hammering out a final version of a proposal to elevate the current NAIC suitability rule to something closer to a best-interest standard, or what some have called “suitability plus.”

    Callie Woods, a NAIC spokeswoman, confirmed on Aug. 6 that the NAIC Annuity Suitability Working Group’s final draft had been sent to the full Life Insurance and Annuities Committee. That committee will require at least one month to debate and discuss the final wording, Woods said.

    Last month, New York State released — ahead of the Annuity Suitability Working Group’s final draft — its own final, tougher, more explicit best-interest-standard regulation on sales of annuities, as well as life insurance. Per the New York regulation, which takes effect in August 2019, agents and brokers need to put consumers’ best interests ahead of their own.

    Created in April of 2017, the Working Group was partly a response to the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule, which, had it not been struck down by the courts, would have required advisors to act in the best interests of clients with respect to retirement accounts. This would have also extended to annuity sales.

    The Working Group, headed by Dean Cameron, director of Idaho’s Department of Insurance, fully reviewed the comments received on the revisions to the Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation (#275).

    Best-Interest Framework

    This Aug. 4 gathering in Boston came on the heels of a special meeting that the Working Group held in Kansas City, Mo., on June 1.

    Although New York pushed ahead with its version of a stepped-up regulation for both annuities and life insurance, the NAIC working group is widely expected to make a model rule covering annuities only.

    During the Kansas City meeting, a consensus was reached via straw poll to opt for what could be described as something akin to a best-interest standard – even if the precise term “consumers’ best interest” is not expressly used. It’s being called a “suitability plus” standard.

    This approach would seem to track with what the Securities and Exchange Commission is looking to pursue as far the agency’s proposed new standard governing conduct of brokers.

    Michael Humphreys, assistant commissioner for insurance at the Tennessee Department of Commerce, was among those who expressed support for the Iowa approach — a best-interest structure, but without using the term “best interest” expressly, according to a published summary of the Kansas City gathering.

    James Regalbuto, Deputy Superintendent for Life Insurance, New York State Department of Financial Services, expressed concern about not including a specific “best interest” standard, according to the summary. He worried about the message it would send to consumers, according to the official minutes of that Kansas City gathering. Regalbuto expressed support for including the term “best interest” in the revisions.

    The standards debate centers mainly on Section 6 of the proposed rules model, “Duties of Insurers and of Insurance Producers.” “Our end goal is to have a product that can pass not only this group, but the (NAIC) A Committee, plenary and ultimately the states,” Idaho Insurance Commissioner Dean Cameron said in Kansas City.

    The industry is closely watching the NAIC to see what regulatory framework it produces, said John Hilton, senior editor, InsuranceNewsNet. “Having defeated the Department of Labor fiduciary rule, insurers are now waiting out not only the NAIC, but the SEC as well.”

    Iowa Leads Way Forward 

    Language submitted by the Iowa Insurance Division (IID) drew support from several members of the working group.

    Below are some of the key phrases that the IID put forward for use in Section 6, “Duties of Insurers and of Insurance Producers,” of the annuity transactions model law.

    A (1)

    In recommending to a consumer the purchase of an annuity or the exchange of an annuity that results in another insurance transaction or series of insurance transactions, the producer, or the insurer where no producer is involved, shall have reasonable grounds for believing that the recommendation is suitable for the particular consumer.

    A (2)

    “Reasonable grounds for believing that a recommendation is suitable” requires reasonable competence, trustworthiness, fair dealing, diligence, care and skill by the producer or the insurer where no producer is involved.

    A (3)

    These standards require a consumer-focused evaluation and reasonable disclosures of the producer’s or insurer’s interests so that the consumer’s interests are placed ahead of the interests of the producer or insurer and the producer’s compensation and material conflicts of interest are merely incidental to the transaction.

    This does not mean that the annuity product with the lowest one-time or multiple occurrence compensation structure must necessarily be recommended, but the recommendation must be diligently focused on whether the product costs, rates, benefits, features and other contractual provisions of the annuity address the actual financial situation, objectives and needs of the particular consumer.

    A (4)

    These standards shall be applied in a limited manner and scope to the licensed authority and qualification of the producer, or insurer where no producer is involved, and whether the producer, or insurer where no producer is involved, is only authorized to recommend a limited range of annuity products or product types.

    A (5)

    These standards require the producer, or insurer where no producer is involved, to orally or in writing describe to the consumer the grounds for the recommendation.

    A (6)

    The producer, or insurer where no producer is involved, shall consider all factors including the consumer’s suitability information, product costs, rates, benefits, features and other contractual provisions. The factors set forth are generally relevant in making a suitability determination, but the level of importance of each factor may vary depending on the facts and circumstances of a particular case. Factors should not be considered in isolation.

    B. Prior to the recommendation of an annuity, a producer, or an insurer where no producer is involved, shall do all of the following:

    (1) Make reasonable efforts to obtain suitability information from the consumer;

    (2) Consider the types of products the producer, or insurer where no producer is involved, is authorized and licensed to recommend or sell that may align with the consumer’s disclosed suitability information and address the consumer’s financial situation, objectives and needs.

    Rich Blake: A veteran journalist based in New York City, Blake has covered the financial world for numerous publications, including Institutional Investor, ABCNews.com and Reuters. Blake was a co-founder and executive editor of Trader Monthly magazine. The Buffalo native is the author of three nonfiction books, including “The Day Donny Herbert Woke Up,” which is currently being adapted into a motion picture. In 2004, Blake was nominated for a National Magazine Award in the Reporting category for Institutional Investor.

    Originally Posted at BISA Portfolio on August 7, 2018 by Rich Blake.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency