We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • SEC Orders Transamerica Affiliates to Repay $97M Over Rookie’s Faulty Quant Models

    August 28, 2018 by Melanie Waddell

    Four Transamerica affiliates were ordered by the Securities and Exchange Commission Monday to refund $97 million to misled retail investors over faulty investment models created by an inexperienced junior analyst.

    According to the SEC’s order, investors put billions of dollars into mutual funds and variable annuity strategies using the faulty models developed by investment advisor Aegon USA Investment Management LLC, along with its affiliated investment advisors Transamerica Asset Management and Transamerica Financial Advisors, and its affiliated broker-dealer Transamerica Capital Inc., which claimed that investment decisions would be based on AUIM’s quantitative models.

    Click HERE to read the original story via ThinkAdvisor. 

    The agency also brought separate charges against AUIM’s former global chief investment officer, Bradley Beman, and AUIM’s former director of new initiatives, Kevin Giles, for causing certain AUIM violations.

    Between July 2011 and June 2015, the order states, the affiliates violated the federal securities laws while offering, selling and managing 15 quantitative-model-based mutual funds, variable life insurance investment portfolios, and variable annuity investment portfolios and separately managed account strategies.

    Starting in 2010, “AUIM tasked the analyst — who had recently earned his MBA, but had no experience in portfolio management or any formal training in financial modeling — with developing quantitative models for use in managing investment strategies (i.e., models making investment allocation and models making trading decisions),” according to the order.

    “AUIM ultimately used these models to manage each of the products and strategies,” the order states.

    The analyst “did not follow any formal process to confirm the accuracy of his work, and AUIM failed to provide him meaningful guidance, training or oversight as he developed the models or to confirm that the models worked as intended before using them to manage client assets.”

    The four affiliates marketed all of the products and strategies as “managed using a proprietary quant model,” and highlighted, when marketing certain of the products and strategies, their ‘emotionless,’ ‘model-driven’ or ‘model supported’ investment management process and described how the models were supposed to operate,” the SEC said. “These claims necessarily implied that the models worked as intended.”

    However, the four affiliates launched the products and strategies “without first confirming that the models worked as intended and/or without disclosing any recognized risks associated with using the models.”

    During the summer of 2013, AUIM, the order continues, “discovered that certain of the models contained errors and concluded that that these errors rendered at least one of the models ‘to not be fit for purpose.’”

    AUIM stopped using, running or relying on at least one of the models in September 2013, but AUIM and Transamerica Asset Management “failed to disclose the models’ errors and AUIM’s decision to stop using the model to the board of trustees of Transamerica Funds,” according to the SEC order. “Certain of the respondents never publicly disclosed the discovery of errors or AUIM’s decision to discontinue use of the model.”

    “Investors were repeatedly misled about the quantitative models being used to manage their investments, which subjected them to significant hidden risks and deprived them of the ability to make informed investment decisions,” said C. Dabney O’Riordan, co-chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit.

    A spokesperson for the Transamerica affiliates said in a statement Monday that “while the models at issue are no longer in use, we recognize we must do better, and we have taken steps to enhance our policies, procedures and disclosure processes. We remain confident in our investment process and are committed to continuously improving our business. We cooperated fully with the SEC throughout the regulatory investigation of the issues and are pleased to put this matter behind us.”

    Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the four Transamerica entities agreed to settle the SEC’s charges and pay nearly $53.3 million in disgorgement, $8 million in interest, and a $36.3 million penalty, and will create and administer a fair fund to distribute the entire $97.6 million to affected investors.

    In separate orders, the SEC found that Beman did not take reasonable steps to make sure the mutual funds’ models worked as intended and that he and Giles both contributed to AUIM’s compliance failings related to the development and use of models.

    Beman and Giles agreed to settle the SEC’s charges without admitting or denying the findings and pay, respectively, $65,000 and $25,000 in penalties that also will be distributed to affected investors.

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on August 27, 2018 by Melanie Waddell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency