We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Blog + Articles

Categories

  • Industry Articles (11,798)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (15)
  • Negative Media (123)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (459)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (144)
  • Wink's Articles (180)
  • Wink's Blogs (139)
  • Wink's Press Releases (71)
  • Blog Archives

  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • Opinion: Do annuities have a place in your retirement portfolio?

    November 22, 2018 by Mark Hulbert

    To annuitize or not to annuitize?

    Hardly the elegant alliteration of a Shakespeare. But, nonetheless, this remains an urgent question that nearly all retirees and soon-to-be-retirees face at one time or another.

    And, despite an enormous amount of ink having been spilled on the question over the last few decades, a consensus answer appears as elusive as ever.

    Click HERE to read the original article via MarketWatch. 

    The latest kerfuffle that reminds us how unsettled this question remains appeared recently at Advisor Perspectives, the platform on which financial advisers debate the pros and cons of various strategies and investment products. One of the current debates, now stretching back nearly a month and containing a couple of dozen posts from various advisers, is whether Single Premium Immediate Annuities (SPIAs) amount to anything more than “a great wealth building product but only for those selling them making good commissions.”

    SPIAs, just to review, are the most basic of annuities, in which you immediately start receiving an annuity payout that is guaranteed for life. To illustrate, I asked Vanguard to provide an illustration for a single 65-year old male investing $100,000 in a SPIA. According to an email from Vanguard, such an investor would be able to secure guaranteed monthly payments of $565.05 from now until he dies.

    One of the specific criticisms recently leveled at SPIAs is that they are the functional equivalent of buying a long-term bond, and most would question the wisdom of investing in long-term bonds when interest rates are as low as they are now. That’s because both the SPIA and the long-term bond are vulnerable to a big uptick in inflation.

    To appreciate how vulnerable both investments are to inflation, imagine that inflation averages 5% for the next 20 years. I chose this time frame since that is the life expectancy of a single male aged 65, according to the Social Security Administration. This inflation assumption is more than double what the market is currently expecting inflation to average over the next 20, according to the 20-year breakeven inflation rate.

    When using that inflation assumption as the discount rate, and assuming that our current 65-year old annuitant dies in 20 years, the net present value of his annuity is around $84,500. That’s only slightly better than the approximately $79,000 net present value of a 20-year Treasury bond purchased today and held to maturity.

    Needless to say, both net present values are well below the $100,000 initial investments in each.

    But is this criticism fair? To find out, I checked in with Jeffrey Brown, Dean of the College of Business at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and director of the Retirement Research Center of the National Bureau of Economic Research. Professor Brown has devoted much of his research over the years to analyzing annuities.

    In an email, he acknowledged “that a shortcoming of most SPIAs is that they lack inflation protection.” But, he hastened to add, this “does NOT suggest that zero annuitization is the right amount. Rather, it suggests that one does not want to fully annuitize.”

    In any case, he continued, comparing an annuity to a long-term bond is comparing apples to oranges, since “the entire point of an annuity is to insure against longevity risk,” and a bond does not provide such insurance. “There is no other product out there that guarantees an income stream for as long as you live. As has been proven again and again in numerous academic and practitioner papers, having a base of annuitized income is the only real way to ensure a basic level of income that cannot be outlived.”

    Professor Brown continued: “It is easy to criticize annuities if you are not required to provide an alternative approach that guarantees one will have sufficient income in the event one lives to 100.” An adviser who doesn’t rely on annuities is either exposing his/her clients “to significant longevity risk, or significant asset market risk, or both.”

    What is the right amount to allocate to annuities in your retirement portfolio? The answer, as you can imagine, depends on a whole host of assumptions.

    One clue comes from an analysis conducted by David Blanchett, head of retirement research at Morningstar. His focus was on deferred-income annuities, which differ from SPIAs in that their guaranteed payment begins at a later point. After analyzing more than 78,000 possible scenarios, each one of which represents a different series of assumptions, Blanchett found that the average optimal allocation across all scenarios was 30.52%.

    For more information, including descriptions of the Hulbert Sentiment Indices, go to The Hulbert Financial Digest or email mark@hulbertratings.com.

    Originally Posted at MarketWatch on November 15, 2018 by Mark Hulbert.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency